Tolstoy recalls when he was writing the part in which the heroine of the novel herself in front of the train in Anna Karenina, he recovered that he retreated on his office and started crying, so the death of Anna Karnina made the control of his feelings impossible. Tolstoy says that Anna Karnina did not want to die, but her destiny and personality were the one who led her to throw herself in front of the train in an inevitable way. Thus, with all the writers of the great realism of the nineteenth century, who found themselves in an experience in which they are unable to control the destinies of their personalities, they are also led by the destiny of these inevitable personalities. All the writers of the great realism consider that they are just speakers of their characters, and they feel that their imaginary characters replace them in terms of importance and significance. We can say that it is like that when Nora decided to leave the house, Henrick Ibsen could not prevent her from doing this in any way. The writer is just a narrator behind the scenes, neither has power nor the ability to control the fate of his personalities. The more the writer said, the more his personality, the more lively and vibrant, and vice versa, if the writer has a hand in the direction of the story and the amount of the character, that character seemed rigid and fierce. The matter is the same in the literature of realism, the less the writer's authority and position regarding the fate of his personality, the better. In other words, the best that the writer can do is to disappear.